Sunday, 14 April 2013

Week 4 - Activity 12: Background to MOOCs Notes

Activity 12: Background to MOOCs Notes

Streamed live on 15 Oct 2012
An interview/discussion with Dave Cormier and George Siemens on MOOCs, to be used in the Open University open course, on, erm, open education.
 
2008 MOOC - George - 2007 online conferences, open. Made use of technology in teaching.
 
Dave - Why the term MOOC.  
PLE MOOC - set aside 10 weeks of time to work together where ever one adds in and learns together. MOOCs = connection. Open = Transparent
Course -> Need a date and topic.  People feel a part of something, a member of a group (it is social). The blogs and forum postings re-enforce this feeling. The feeling that something is alive. So a bit like a classroom except you have to digitally walk through the door to receive and partake of it. And it is easier not to walk through this digital door. But the MOOC endurance, participatory involvement, will be enhanced by VR and AG because of the ease and speed of entering and leaving. No need to turn on the computer, sign in, open blogs, open sites. It will all be open and in front of your eyes, with Google Glasses or similar. Got a spare 10 minutes whilst in traffic or a shopping queue, then go back to school. Learning will be done in discrete packets.    
 
Watch this interview in which George Siemens and Dave Cormier are interviewed by Martin Weller, about a range of issues concerning MOOCs.
 
Early MOOCs issues:
  • High drop out rates
    • Students do not complete the course
    • Participation - requires a deeper input (in my opinion)
  • The person who "chats" a lot gains significance - although they may not be studying - too busy chatting
  • Learner expectation - Learner feedback - can be negative feedback
  • Expectations to finish a course, may not be the goal
    • That's bullshite though. MOOC VIPS are redefining the terms of course success because of the high dropout rate. Citing that something good always comes out of a limited exposure to the course. Agree, but only of the mindset of the person who "drops out" does not see themselves as a failure for having done so (as school teaches).
  • So many participants results in too much content/feedback which results in work overload.
  • Need more MOOC organisers/supervisors to volunteer to help
  • Open -> more surprise from free-loaders
  • Open -> allows development of course content etc. And allows one to learn more and reflect
  • Massive - pedagogy changes (peer learning), need to adjust way of learning, i.e. my aspect is to ignore it all, or to find a system or tool to help me locate what I am interesting.
  • Cliques form in MOOCs.
  • Is there a MOOC on how to learn from a MOOC - or is this it?
  • MIT etc. just copy classroom structure
    • But is that not a good way to introduce online learning to new learners?
  • MOOCs -> add a business model might fuck it all up
  • Small payment for MOOCs -> May lead to mainstream of topics.
    • Trade organization should run their own MOOCs
  • Coursera - Developing world students take the courses.
    • Joining big MOOCs means a loss of creative and different MOOC structures
  • MOOC future
    • Just named what was happening anyway (Think of NAND computer course)
    • Universities are dead already if their contract is about delivering content
    • Practical skills and experience cannot be gained - all lab work
    • Machine learning for auto-assessment
    •  New models of education will result from MOOCs
  • MOOCs cause the questioning of the Higher Education system and where it is going
Interesting. It wasn't just about MOOCs but the effect they have on society and the future of education.
 
Read McAuley et al. (2010), The MOOC Model for Digital PracticeExternal link . NOTES FOLLOW BELOW for this report
This is a lengthy report so if you do not have time to read it all focus on the Executive Summary and the section entitled ‘Gaps in knowledge about MOOCs’.

This paper is about how participants of MOOCs can make money, based in Canada.
By exploring the relationship of MOOCs to the digital economy in general and their potential roles to prepare citizens for participation in that digital economy in particular, it illustrates one particularly Canadian model of how these needs may be addressed.
 
The first summarizes what a MOOC is:
What is a MOOC? by Dave Cormier - seen it already, see previous post
 
The second summarizes what new users may need to consider for success in a MOOC:
Success in a MOOC by Dave Cormier
5 Steps to Succeed in a MOOC
  1. Orient - yourself
    1. Where are the materials
    2. What do I need to sign up for
    3. How to search the blogs and forums
    4. How to post to them
    5. Where are all the links?
    6. (See my first blog posts...)
    7. MOOC is paced - defined time structure (A big disadvantage and issue, because when the time has elapsed is the MOOC not dead? Am I the only one playing catch-up? No, but having fallen behind am I now the inferior person, despite all the valid reasons on job, family, home commitments? This is, in my opinion, a huge disincentive to continue the MOOC. MOOCs should re-start every time period, they should have no time scale (like Stanford MOOC Computing 101). Any MOOC that obliges one to meet the exact time schedule is dead in the water as far as I am concerned.
    8. "The more material you cover the more you can participate". Yes but, if you dedicate 100% of your available time to covering the material then there is no time for participation. And what do we gain from a few comments to a posting etc? compared to covering more material? So far, covering out-weighs participation for me.
  2. Declare
    1. Blogs, tags,
    2. Reflections
    3. Nothing happens - yep, no comments on my blog, but do I care? No.
  3. Network
    1. To get feedback on our posts - why? Yes, all the usual answers, but generally speaking the comments do not provide insight, more of a forced distraction really.
    2. Why is the course all about my vapid comments on someone else's posts? I don't see this as being a necessary integral part of a MOOC. Yes, helpful to drop in and out of them, but only if time allows.
    3. The problem of making "connections" is the time required, and lost, to engage in the conversations. Which then can often result in intellectual arguments over semantics and grammar. There is an opportunity for too much wasted time, unless we can agree on some "networking" ground rules such as:
      1. The author of the original piece is in no way obliged to respond to any comments, feedback or question presented to him/her
      2. The original author does not even need to commit to reading any 3rd party comments made to their work
      3. None of this would be viewed as being rude
      4. Other people may post if they wish or not in the understanding that they may receive nothing in return
      5. To put it bluntly, who gives a shit what you think?
  4. Cluster
    1. Grouping with people of the same opinions - thus given that my opinion is that I don't want to spend time "Networking" then that "unNetworking" group is not going to cluster.
  5. Focus
    1. Half-way through we might wander off. But hang on, is that not the mark of a successful MOOC? The individual has found what they are really interested in, as a result of the MOOC, and then gone off to follow this path "follow their dream"? Is a call to focus the right thing?
    2. Success is Open after all. The expression "Failure is not an option" may well be literally interpreted to mean exactly that, no one fails as MOOC, as success is having participated for some of it. I would argue that perhaps when the going gets tough the drop-outs exceed all expectations at success.

The third touches on the creation of knowledge in a MOOC:
Knowledge in a MOOC by Dave Cormier
  • MOOC creates a dynamic knowledge base
  • Network creation
The fourth provides an example of how MOOCs might be presented as a contributor to a digital
economy:
http://edactive.ca/mooc/digitaleconomysample = http://innovation2010.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/video-archive2010.php?video=21&lang=en and http://innovation-forum.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/video-archive2010.php?video=21&lang=en
Social media
Open course
Topic within a company - for IBM perhaps?
MOOCs create a social space.
MOOC on Future of Education
India and Mexico contributed to change the thinking
Gains - collaboration, gain an Internet presence
Gain network around the same topic people are interested in
Gain - an online presence

Q&A
How "Massive" do you want?
>100 professionals in a MOOC begins to make things confusing

A set of MOOC videos at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eNoTC5jRqs&list=PLQnexh-7vC1fqS9eFYj7agFvTskqoMWRJ

p.4 MOOC: An integration of:
1. Social network
2. Expert(s) in the field
3. Collection of free resources

Q. Percentage breakdown? How to measure? Is there an ideal amount for the "perfect", most successful MOOC? What makes a successful MOOC?

MOOCs seem to be offered in real-time, but what about working through a MOOC later?

P.5. "Participation in a MOOC is emergent, fragmented, diffuse, and diverse. It can be frustrating. It’s not unlike life."
Agreed. Being part of one is like a newborn. I am attempting to crawl before I can walk and then run. I do not wish to participate in the social network until I am out of nappies.

P.7 "parallels between MOOCs and commercial ventures such as the Massive Open Online Novel (http://mongoliad.com) or the “Indigo MBA” (http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/Indigo-MBA/indigomba-giz.html)argue that there may be potential for revenue generation that do not unduly compromise the free and open nature of the MOOC model."

Massive Open Online Novel (http://mongoliad.com)
The Mongoliad was originally conceived and presented as a community-driven, enhanced, serial novel that could be read on your Web browser, smart phone, or tablet. This site and the material available through the iOS and Android apps is a record of the serialized experience, but is no longer considered to be the definitive text of The Mongoliad.

The story is set in the year 1241 CE when Europe thought that the Mongol Horde was about to completely destroy their world and only a small band of warriors and mystics stood in the way of utter defeat and subjugation by the great Khan.

Indigo MBA” (http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/Indigo-MBA/indigomba-giz.html)argue
Dead link - I guess their commercial venture didn't succeed.
http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/indigomba/ - A link to some books.

If lots of people become involved in the "Digital Economy" who is left to do the "real" work? Growing food, doing the plumbing, wiring, building. In the developed world, people will want to be part of the "Digital world" because it's a damn sight more comfy to work on the computer rather than get their hands dirty. People with good practical skills will benefit because of the lack of people with those skills.

We need to run a small MOOC for children to follow. One done: http://blogs.slj.com/neverendingsearch/2012/12/02/moocs-for-kids-too/

But last week, the University of Miami Global Academy–an online high school sponsored by UM’s Division of Continuing and International Education. launched what may be the first free MOOC for high school students–a three-week test prep class designed to get students ready for the Collage Board’s SAT Subject Test in Biology.

Hello!
I am developing the OC@ADLC – The Open Classroom at ADLC. We offered #BEFA12, a course about digital identity and digital literacy for HS students in November/12. Please check it out. Version 2 will be offered in April 2013 – Free and open to any High School student.
http://www.openclassroomonline.com/beyondfacebook12-open-online-course-4hs-students-by-hs-students/

Back to the article - ICT in the classroom has not helped develop a knowledge-based economy. Probably because the ICT teachers haven't a clue. The report believes MOOCs will do the job.

P.9 "In a digital economy, capital lies in the capacity to leverage, connect, and promote knowledge
(Lesser, 2000). The capacity for production and flow of manufactured goods defined prosperity in
the industrial economy. Similarly, the capacity to create, improve, innovate with, and apply knowledge will define prosperity in a digital economy (Cormier, 2010).
"

Just as the capacity to service existing infrastructure will define prosperity for those who can do it.

An investigation in to MOOCs as used by International secondary school students within Bangkok, Thailand.

P.10 "The term came into being in 2008, though versions of very large open online courses were in existence before that time (McAuley, 2010)."

P.14  'webcast academy'http://webcastacademy.net/

 P.19 "I had been participating from the position of a person with both something to contribute and something to learn. Once I felt I didn't have much to offer, I had trouble maintaining my sense of my role."
Right! So, if she were a person with something to learn before something to contribute she may have found it easier to return, since she had no perceived expectations to hold up to, built up from past postings. Q. Check the number of people who complete the OU MOOC and the extent of their postings compared to those who did not complete and the number of their postings.




This report contains a historical account of the main players in MOOC research. The question begs, what do the people who actually create the large MOOCs say and think?

P.24 The model that defines MOOCs:
Based on this discussion, we settled on the pedagogical model that continues to define MOOCs:
  • High levels of learner control over modes and places of interaction (Users can pick from a choice of communication methods)
  • Weekly synchronous sessions with facilitators and guest speakers (Contact to keep people engaged)
  • The Daily email newsletter as a regular contact point for course participants. The Daily includes a summary of Moodle forums, course participant blogs, Twitter discussions related to the course, etc.
  • Using RSS-harvesting (gRSShopper) to track blogs of course participants
  • Emphasis on learner autonomy in selecting learning resources and level of participation in activities
  • Emphasis on social systems as effective means for learners to self-organize and way finding through complex subject areas
  • The criticality of “creation” - i.e. learners create and share their understanding of the course
  • topics through blogs, concept maps, videos, images, and podcasts. Creating a digital artifact helps learners to re-centre the course discussion to a more personal basis.

gRSShopper - created by Downes, contains adverts. Looks defunct. 2 reviews.

CCK08
http://www.fininformatica.it/wp/category/cck08/
About a year ago, I launched a survey on the use of the wide range of technological tools used within the Connectivism and Connective Knowledge Online Course (CCK08).
This might be interesting - his paper on
The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools, trying to summarize the results and make some hypothesis on the findings.

The study has now been published in The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL) in its Special Issue: Openness and the Future of Higher Education edited by David Wiley and John Hilton III.

Okay, enough of this report - got too boring.  Waffled on too much and become a bit repetitive in places. i.e. the number of MOOCS can be counted on the fingers of 2 hands.


Read Weller (2012b), MOOCs IncExternal link .
28/05/2012

Curtis Bonk’s course ?
Hmm.. last post 7 May 2012, nearly a year ago.

I agree with the benefits of mainstreamed MOOCs
1. Can up scale the MOOC
2. Legitimizes the course - i.e. it become recognized.
3. Creates a defined structure and standard that works, in theory
4. More robust - not experimental - more professional - less user frustrations
5. Possible to make money from them - pay for the accreditation at the end.

Current large MOOCs not Open, free yes, Open no.

Weller sounds upset that he will be forgotten, or become a has-bean. Surely not? "and 10 years from now people will be writing papers that cite Stanford as the initiator of open courses."

Internet memory lasts about a month on average.


Additional resources

The MOOC GuideExternal link : Stephen Downes (undated) sets out some of the history of MOOCs.
Online guide, can cache with :
http://www.httrack.com/ - HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility. See C:\My Sites

AmnesimoocExternal link : Martin Weller (2012a) outlines the differences between online distance education courses and large-scale online open courses.
Web posting on difference between large scale distance learning and MOOC

What is a MOOC?External link : JISC webinar (2012) describing the MOOC phenomenon and demonstrating examples of practice and support in the UK.
A blackboard recorded session. Seminar -> Webinar - a bit clunky. Didn't fully load.

Now for the activity itself.







 

Saturday, 13 April 2013

Week 4 MOOCs - Notes

MOOCs

After studying this week, you should understand:
  • the different types of MOOC and the issues surrounding them
  • the evidence of learner behaviour and the effectiveness of MOOCs
  • the learner experience in MOOCs
  • the strengths and weaknesses of MOOCs as an approach
  • personal learning networks.

The term ‘MOOC’ was coined by Dave Cormier and arose after his analysis of one of the first MOOCs, the ‘Connectivism and Connected Knowledge’ course (known as CCK08) run by George Siemens and Stephen Downes.

The MOOC Guide

https://sites.google.com/site/themoocguide/3-cck08---the-distributed-course


03. CCK08 - The Distributed CourseThe Connectivism and Connective Knowledge course (CCK08) was the first to incorporate open learning with distributed content, making it the first true MOOC. It attracted 2200 participants worldwide




One of the most innovative MOOCs in its use of technology has been DS106External link , the digital storytelling course run by Jim Groom

DS106 looks like a very rewarding and creative course. I think anyone who completed this course must have learned a lot, both new skills and perhaps more about themselves and what the can achieve.

What is a MOOC? 4 min by Dave Cormier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gMGqcZQc
A concise and quick intro to MOOCs that definitely promotes the social and networking aspects of the programme.

Sir Ken Robinson - Education will explode because of MOOCs. People will learn what they want and not what they were offered at school. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RumyGvl-vk)

The early experimentation led to more mainstream adoption of MOOCs, and in 2011 two Stanford professors offered an open course in artificial intelligence that attracted over 100,000 students. This was followed in 2012 by Harvard and MIT announcing the formation of edXExternal link , a joint initiative to offer open courses. In addition, the Stanford team founded Udacity, a commercial enterprise to offer open courses, and a number of universities started offering courses through Coursera.


Weel 3 - Activity 11: The advantages and disadvantages of big and little OER


Notes
I have been falling quite far behind on this due to holiday time. Still, can get back into it now.
I watched the slidecast but found the audio levels very low (one of the drawbacks of little OER). I followed up on some of the links, including watching a weird video of Martin Weller talking to his future self, with beard and pipe.

1. Benefits of big OER approaches.
  • Looks professional is professional - set's a standard
  • Big OER is planned, specified, designed, implemented, tested. 3rd party content removed and replaced.
  • The OER should be 100 legal
  • More comprehensive content and robust support systems (for example, system remembers all your past quizzes, and where you are in the OER. Maybe making suggestions for what to look at next).
  • A professional (experts?) collaborative OER should in theory lack errors and biases that may be inherent in a single (little) OER.
  • Interactive
  • One Big OER probably leads on to another relevant OER in a sequence
  • More likely to be known and/or recognized as an expert source of data/knowledge/information
  • Markets the institution that created it

2. Drawbacks of big OER approaches.
  • Content of OER may contain more than the user wants or requires, thereby taking the user time to locate and focus upon their required OER from the provided.
  • Geared towards a big audience and therefore less "personal" in the perceived approach/content/delivery method.

3. Benefits of little OER approaches.
  • Quick to do. No need to discuss with a team if it is just you creating the resource
  • Can be aimed at a specific niche audience
  • Cheap/free to do
  • Supposedly specialist skills not required.
  • Maybe possible to find OER content specific to a very narrow field

4. Drawbacks of little OER approaches.
  • Marketing it - Making the public aware of its existence
  • Need some technical skills - not only to make the resource but also to share it and manage them/it. (E.g. this slideshare, 2,773 views, with very low level audio level making it hard to hear without external amplification or headphones).
  • Lacks quality control - e.g. hard to read black text due to background colour/image
  • Usually a single simple resource (podcast, slideshare). No integration of multiple resources.
  • Less interactive courses/content
  • A single person resource could have errors or biases in their resource
  • Is the OER 100% legal, no copied images, all content allowed to be shared? No time or possibly motivation to remove or cite all sources within little OER
  • Lack of peer review of content can lead to a poor quality little OER

Sunday, 7 April 2013

Week 3 - Activity 10: Applying sustainability models


Change MOOCExternal link 
8 month course. "Each week, a new professor or researcher will introduce his or her central contribution to the field."
Facilitators, George Siemens, Stephen Downes, and Dave Cormier
this course is not conducted in a single place or environment. It is distributed across the web.
Closest model match is the Rice model, apparent from the "About" and "How it works" links.
It's not clear if the facilitators are paid, seems like they are not.

CourseraExternal link 
Looks very much like the MIT model with founders and a "team". They advertise job positions on their website and so these must be paid positions. MIT model then. This seemed apparent, also from the quality of their website. Time, and therefore, money has been and is being spent to make a quality site and courses.

Jorum
Website looks like the USU or Rice model, probably USU.
Jorum is a Jisc funded Service in Development in UK Further and Higher Education, to collect and share learning and teaching materials, allowing their reuse and repurposing. Majority female team made up of more Chiefs than Indians, who do not seem to do anything concrete in editing or working on any courses content. Lacks the quality of MIT model and the funding. Most similar to USU but I cannot find reference to removing 3rd part content, but then I guess they do not need to as content is provided mostly by UK Uni's as is. Not same as Rice model since in that model individuals work on the courses worldwide.

OpenLearn
Budding MIT model. Paid from by OU but only supporting their own OU course content, unlike other models. This does not fall into any of the above models. A bit of each really. People within the OU build the course, OL promote and offer the course. Funding from OU and therefor paying students.












Thursday, 4 April 2013

Week 3 - Activity 9: Choosing a licence

Activity 9: Choosing a license

A fairly easy task, if one uses the easy CC chooser. I chose this license:

Creative Commons License
This OU Open h817 course blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Click here to learn what it means: CC meaning which explains the reasons I selected this. I don't want people making money out of what I do, unless it's me. I do want people to build on anything I create as I can learn from it, and I do want my name to travel with the work in case it becomes famous and they need to track me down for the knighthood. So all in all, very selfish and egotistical reasons as oppose to the moral imperative we aspire to.

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Week 2 - Activity 8: An OER course


Evaluation Reflect upon whether the use of OER caused you to change what you wanted to teach, and what time saving (if any) would be gained by using OER.

Ariadne tended to come up with nothing. The one time it did find something, on the second search page, following the link resulted in "The system cannot find the path specified." Jorum gives thousands of hits, sometimes over 3,000. However for my week 4 and 5 searches I found a relevant PDF, which although was too advanced for my needs could be useful for a higher level class and/or school management. Merlot was useless, giving me nothing or irrelevant hits. MIT's results were all far too complex or not relevant. OpenLearn came up with something that looked useful for my week 3 search but the content was from 2007 and a link to an online scanner website did not work. A link to another document took me to something from 2004, too old to be of use (I read it and the content was dated, with reference to "AOL Online"). Rice Connexions was very slow to return a search list for every search done over 2 days and with 5 different search criteria. Searching on "Laptop Care Security" resulted in the first listed most relevant result of "Ten Easy Steps To Move Your Cheese For Better Aging", how could it possible come up with that given the search terms?

Overall, very disappointed given I selected a skills based topic related to laptop use and care, taking into account data backup and security. Admittedly the topics searched on related to school level age, but given the keywords used I expected more. What I tended to get was high-level academic theoretical papers and not down-to-earth practical advice, lesson plans or resources of any kinds (i.e. posters, slides, web tutorials, multimedia). In other words, these OER sites seem pretty useless to me as a source for school level ICT/Computing. I will stick with the current search resources I already have. No time was saved and the results have not made me change what I wanted to teach.

(Search result details can be viewed here: http://davidbrettell-h817.blogspot.com/2013/04/week-2-activity-8-notes.html)

Week 2 - Activity 8 Notes

Scenario

Imagine you are constructing a course in digital skills for an identified group of learners (e.g. undergraduates, new employees, teachers, mature learners, military personnel, etc.). It is a short, online course aimed at providing these learners with a set of resources for developing ‘digital skills’. It runs for five weeks, with a different subject each week, accounting for about six hours study per week.
  • Devise a broad outline of the topics to be covered every week. Don’t deliberate too much on this; it should be a coherent set of topics but you don’t actually have to deliver it.
  • Now see how much of your desired content could be accommodated by using OER repositories. Search the following repositories and make a quick evaluation for each week of your course of the type of content that is available.
  • You can use the following template for your evaluation. In the final column judge whether the resources are good, medium or bad in terms of suiting your needs.
Hmm.. Cannot insert a table unless I edit it in HTML and I don't have the time to mess around with that so will stick with a simple week by week line based structure.

Digit Skills: Laptops 4 Learning
Identified Group: KS3 (Year 7 to 9)

Week 1:
Topic: Laptop Care (Physical)
The physical care of the student laptop in terms of heat, dust, dirt, keeping it clean.
Resources:
  • AriadneExternal link  - nothing
  • 1 article and not relevant.
  • JorumExternal link  - nothing
  • 1081 results.
    Staffordshire University; The Betty Smithers Design Collection at Staffordshire University (Staffordshire University, ) - Picture of a laptop!
     
    A number of images of laptops and then health care.
     
  • MerlotExternal link - nothing

  • MITExternal link  - nothing in first 3 pages
  • 211 hits
    Care of your notebook (paper!)

  • OpenLearn - nothing
  • 15 hits - some detailed info on batteries
  • Rice ConnexionsExternal link  nothing
    Slow to respond - slowest of the lot
  • 60 results
    slow, slow, slow

  • Suitability (G/M/B):
  • Bad - nothing or too specific and complex.

  • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Week 2:
    Topic: Connecting to the Domain/Network. Mapping drives. Internet settings
    Resources:
  • AriadneExternal link  - nothing

  • JorumExternal link 
  • 2650 hits
    Network security

  • MerlotExternal link - Nothing

  • MITExternal link  - Nothing

  • OpenLearn - Nothing
  • Jargonbuster - okay,but poorly formatted to be useful.
  • Rice ConnexionsExternal link - Nothing
  • Slow. Connection reset.
    More relevant to the topic but nothing that I need for this.

    Suitability (G/M/B):
    Bad - nothing suitable despite a range of terms.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Week 3:
    Topic: Backing up data
    Resources:
  • AriadneExternal link - Nothing
  • Found something of interest on the second page, item 21 (computer operations core lesson templates), but when selected get Error - "The system cannot find the path specified."
  • JorumExternal link - Nothing
  • 3027
  • MerlotExternal link  - irrelevant

  • MITExternal link  - too complex, specific to certain data types.

  • OpenLearn - Yes! Yippee! Found something useful
  • Five ways to.​.​.​ stay safe online -​ OpenLearn -​ Open University
    A bit old - from 2007, lots of text but short sections is okay. Free software link to outdated software, online scan link doesn't work,
    Recommends:  Vandalism in Cyberspace:Understanding and Combating Malicious Software. - doesn't work. Too old, 2004, when searched.

  • Rice ConnexionsExternal link  - irrelevant
    Suitability (G/M/B):
  • Bad. What was found was about 6 years too old.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Week 4:
    Topic: Printing Installing and configuring. Dealing with typical problems (paper jam, out of paper/ink)
    Resources:
  • AriadneExternal link  - Nothing

  • JorumExternal link 
  • ICTs: device to device communication
    http://dspace.jorum.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/10949/998
    Okay - a bit technical re: network communication - downloaded the package but it seems to need a specific reader or something. Will check it out tomorrow.

    STOPPED HERE.
    Started again
    Received my OER Understanding badge - whoopee! My first ever electronic badge, and I've created a Mozilla virtual backpack to stick it on  (https://login.persona.org/) password is the usual one with 123 on the end. I was hoping to see a picture of a backpack with my badge on it.  Oh, I think this is the website http://beta.openbadges.org/  That's quite good.

  • MerlotExternal link  - Nothing

  • MITExternal link  - irrelevant

  • OpenLearn  irrelevant

  • Rice ConnexionsExternal link  wait, wait, .... nothing

  • Suitability (G/M/B):
    B - Did find something possibly of use from JorumExternal link  for another class but the "package" downloaded was not standard file types and there was no link or information about needing a package reader or something. So did not waste time trying to locate the utility.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Week 5:
    Topic: Laptop Care (logical - security)
    Resources:
    Searching on "Laptop Care security" 
  • AriadneExternal link  Nothing

  • JorumExternal link  1473  results,
  • An overview from Jisc Legal which could be very useful for middle managers and heads of subjects to assist in curriculum planning with mobile devices
    Okay, not suitable for what I need but useful nevertheless for another area.

  • MerlotExternal link  Nothing

  • MITExternal link  - irrelevant

  • OpenLearn - - irrelevant

  • Rice ConnexionsExternal link  Moving From The Superintendency To The Professorship: Ten Easy Steps To Move Your Cheese For Better Aging (m14268) - The first choice!

  • Suitability (G/M/B):
    B - I got something semi-relevant although not useful for my needs.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Evaluation Reflect upon whether the use of OER caused you to change what you wanted to teach, and what time saving (if any) would be gained by using OER.

    Ariadne tended to come up with nothing. The one time it did fine something, on the second search page, following the link resulted in "The system cannot find the path specified." Jorum gives thousands of hits, sometimes over 3,000. However for my week 4 and 5 searches I found a relevant PDF, which although was too advanced for my needs could be useful for a higher level class and/or school management. Merlot was useless, giving me nothing or irrelevant hits. MIT's results were all far too complex or not relevant. OpenLearn came up with something that looked useful for my week 3 search but the content was from 2007 and a link to an online scanner website did not work. A link to another document took me to something from 2004, too old to be of use (I read it and the content was dated, with reference to "AOL Online"). Rice Connexions was very slow to return a search list for every search done over 2 days and with 5 different search criteria. Searching on "Laptop Care Security" resulted in the first listed most relevant result of "Ten Easy Steps To Move Your Cheese For Better Aging", how could it possible come up with that given the search terms?

    Overall, very disappointed given I selected a skills based topic related to laptop use and care, taking into account data backup and security. Admittedly the topics searched on related to school level age, but given the keywords used I expected more. What I tended to get was high-level academic theoretical papers and not down-to-earth practical advice, lesson plans or resources of any kinds (i.e. posters, slides, web tutorials, multimedia). In other words, these OER sites seem pretty useless to me as a source for school level ICT/Computing. I will stick with the current search resources I already have. No time was saved and the results have not made me change what I wanted to teach.